Death in July wrap up

I’m still on a high following Death in July. That sounds so wrong, but it feels so right.

This inaugural festival to celebrate Australian women’s crime fiction in Ballarat, a collaboration between Sisters in Crime and Ballarat Writers was by all accounts a roaring success.

Death in July 1

Hauxwell, Meehan, Savage & Redhead talk women’s crime fiction at Death in July. Photo: Ellie Marney

We were warmly welcomed on a cold Friday night by representatives from Ballarat Writers, MADE, City of Ballarat and Sisters in Crime. Yours truly gave the keynote address, ‘Beyond Dicks versus Dames: The state of Australian women’s crime writing’, in which I suggested there is “a unifying thread – albeit gossamer thin – that runs through Australian women’s crime writing. And that thread is moxie, defined by the Oxford Dictionary as ‘force of character, determination, or nerve’.”

I said that while some leading characters in Australian women’s crime writing have moxie, “[m]ore than the characters they create, to my mind, it’s Australian women crime writers themselves who demonstrate the moxie.” I suggested there is moxie at work in the way writers re-cast as heroes characters who traditionally appear in crime fiction as victims. There is moxie in terms of the creative choices women writers make in terms of narrative points of view. There is moxie in the work of women who do not shy away from getting dark and gritty, and who subvert the stereotypes of the genre.

You can read the whole paper by clicking on this link: Beyond Dicks versus Dames_FINAL_Angela Savage. [I will upload a link to the video when available].

Another highlight of the launch was the screening of Chapter One of Blood On Ballarat, a serial short crime fiction story that got off to a running start thanks to Leigh Redhead, with nine Ballarat authors contributing subsequent chapters. Filmed by Yum Studio, each session during the festival was bookended by further episodes. A clever concept, brilliantly executed (no pun intended). Click here to view Chapter One.

The first session Saturday morning was Gum Shoes or High Heels? a discussion of trends in women’s crime fiction with Annie Hauxwell, Maurilia Meehan and yours truly again, chaired by Leigh Redhead. The discussion touched on geography; I voiced my theory that talking about place in crime fiction is what we do to avoid talking about the crimes. I was delighted when someone in the audience later asked a question about what crimes I dealt with in my novels.

We discussed how plots have moved from obsessions with serial killers and paedophiles to cover a broader range of crimes, notably family violence. We talked about how feminist PI characters have become less ‘perfect’, both more flawed and socially connected. We noted that Australian and UK female PIs tend not to be as armed and dangerous as their counterparts in other countries. We also talked about the pros and cons of writing series, which is what publishers seem to prefer. (Maurilia admitted to having four different publishers for her body of work, due to her propensity for trying new things). We touched on whether it is the role of the writer to be socially enlightening or simply to entertain, and I complained that there’s not as much political crime fiction in Australia as I’d like.

Click here to watch the ‘Gum Shoes or High Heels?’ panel on YouTube.

The second panel, Get ‘Em While They’re Young brought Ellie Marney, Simmone Howell and Nansi Kunze together with Lindy Cameron to talk about YA crime fiction. I was too absorbed in the discussion to take much in the way of notes, but I do remember Nansi saying that many adults read YA fiction as a preference for the pace, plots and “less jaded characters”. Ellie added that 55% of YA fiction is bought by over 25s to read themselves. Simmone noted that young people’s almost obsessive (self-)focus and less uncluttered lives makes them attractive as characters: they can legitimately focus on a case with few distractions. Interesting discussion, too, on sex and violence in YA fiction — specifically that the bar is higher for sex than it is for violence. Publishing in the USA, as Ellie will soon do, requires what to me sounded like elaborate warnings about language and sex scenes. For the violent scenes, not so much. Go figure!

Click here to watch the ‘Get ‘Em While They’re Young’ panel on YouTube.

After a wonderful reading by Judith Rodriguez from her novel The Hanging of Minnie Thwaites, Vikki Petraitis chaired the panel Boffins, Ballistics and Bones with forensic pathologist Dr Shelley Robertson, Detective Superintendent Tess Walsh and award-winning true crime writer and journalist Liz Porter. This was a fascinating panel on how “the CSI effect” has distorted public opinion, and even jurors’ expectations, about the ways crimes are solved.

As a crime fiction writer who knows little about forensic science, I admit to taking some comfort from Det Supt Tess Walsh’s comment that “old fashioned detective work not forensics is what solves crimes”; in this she included team work by police and assistance by the general public. Tess also spoke of (minority) cases in which forensic evidence has been crucial, and Liz Porter noted that her true crime books on the subject concern “the one per cent of cases” where this is so. Liz also gave examples of where cases based on DNA evidence has “spectacularly failed” — notably in the Farah Jama case.

Liz had a wonderful line on the “beautiful lies” crime fiction writers tell. These include the way we play with timeframes — real-life forensic tests, when they occur, generally take weeks to produce results — and the way we grossly underestimate suspects. She spoke of cases where police have interviewed 200 “persons of interest”, whereas in fiction, especially on television, suspects tend to be kept to small, manageable numbers.

Click here to watch the ‘Boffins, Ballistics and Bones’ panel on YouTube.

Me & Leigh channelling 1950s housewives. Photo: Deb Bodinnar

Me & Leigh channelling 1950s housewives. Photo: Deb Bodinnar

I had to leave the last session during the audience Q&A in order to frock up for the final event of the festival, The Great Crime Writing Debate: Dames vs Dicks, which saw Vikki, Leigh and I, arguing that ‘dicks’ do crime fiction better, against Robert Gott, Jarad Henry and Andrew Grimes, arguing that ‘dames’ do it better. Last time I attempted one of these comedy debates, I bombed, so I was nervous going into another one. But it turned out to be the most fun I’ve had in ages.

Vikki is simply one of the funniest women I know. Leigh — who, like me, was dressed as a 1950s housewife — channelled a Southern US Bible belt belle, and read hilarious passages on sex written by male crime writers; while I put forward the scientific case for considering reading and writing to be unnatural for women. Robert argued that women do everything better than men, Jarad talked about women being better at killing by castration, and Andrew brought the house down with comments like: “Times change and the world with it, but some things remain the same. There still ain’t nothing like a dame. There are however, many things like a dick. And these can be found online and in specialist retail outlets.”

Half the fun for me was watching the audience reaction from my vantage point on stage. People were laughing with tears rolling down their faces. Priceless!

Crime Writer Sandi Wallace writes more about the Saturday afternoon sessions here.

Photos and video links to follow. Meanwhile, congratulations to everyone who made Death in July such a brilliant success, especially Jill Blee and Carmel Shute.

About Angela Savage

Angela Savage is a Melbourne writer, who has lived and travelled extensively in Asia. She won the Victorian Premier’s Literary Award for an unpublished manuscript, and the Scarlet Stiletto Award short story award. Her latest novel is, Mother of Pearl, published by Transit Lounge. Angela holds a PhD in Creative Writing, is former CEO of Writers Victoria, and currently works as CEO of Public Libraries Victoria.
This entry was posted in Literary Festival, Sisters in Crime and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Death in July wrap up

  1. Khim says:

    WOW ! What a foxy 1950’s housewife with moxie !


  2. Heather says:

    It was a wonderful day yesterday – and the debate was the best I have ever witnessed!


  3. Maybe a separate blog on Dames vs. Dicks debate? How did Jarad Henry handle the pressure? :o)


  4. Margot Kinberg says:

    Oh, Angela, it all sounds like so much fun and so informative. I’m very happy for you all. Thanks for sharing all of this. Definitely resources for me to come back to.


    • angelasavage says:

      I’m so pleased you enjoyed the wrap up, Margot. Truth is, you inspired me to blog about it. So I’m delighted if this post provides some helpful resources 🙂


  5. I was disappointed not to be able to make this event as the line-up looked amazing – fingers crossed the success of the weekend means an opportunity for another one next year!


  6. araneus1 says:

    sounds like a blast!


  7. Yes Angela, the Dames won the day…the Dicks were no match. ‘Death in July’ was a roaring success and the wonderful ‘Sisters in Crime’ just kept the action happening…Heather from Ballarat Writers


  8. kathy d. says:

    Oh, I love this, even from afar. I’m laughing just reading about the crackling wit. Reading passages about sex written by male crime writers? Had to be hilarious. They’re always funny to read in the books!
    I’ll read/see your talk and eagerly await the video of the debate, which sounds off the charts funny.


  9. Jillian says:

    I had a fantastic weekend and enjoyed every session, every panelist and learned a heap about crime writing and a bit about agents, and getting published. Thanks Angela for your contribution to the festival. I thought you were fabulous!


  10. kathy d. says:

    I love your talk. Just read it. Now I have to copy down all of the women authors’ names and try to find their books. You had just the right balance of history of women crime fiction writers, current information — and humor! And you mentioned many writers whom I am familiar with, but so many more I must read.
    And I loved the dedication at the beginning to the Indigenous people and also your ancestors. I teared up a bit at that. It was so appropriate.
    I can barely wait for the video and the one of that debate: I know I’ll fall over laughing. Since all of Oz’s mystery writers seem to be witty souls, it’ll be a lot of fun.
    I’ll pass it on, too, as I just sent link to your talk to a few friends.


    • angelasavage says:

      Thanks for that feedback, Kathy. I did try to mention as many Australian women crime writers as I could, though with 76 books in contention for this year’s Davitt Awards, I had to be careful not to end up with a talk filled with lists. I confess I have not read every author referred to in my paper; I read much true crime, for example, and I can take or leave the graphically violent forensic stuff. But as I allude to in the paper, there’s something for everyone across the genre.


  11. Great post to read and motivated


  12. Pingback: Australian Women Writers Challenge 2014 wrap-up | Angela Savage

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s