Review: The Casual Vacancy

I mentioned in my previous post that Radio National Books And Arts made me an offer I couldn’t refuse when they asked me to review JK Rowling’s new novel, The Casual Vacancy.

How could anyone say no to a book that sold 2.5 million copies before it was even released? To review The Casual Vacancy was a chance to bask in the reflected glory of a literary supernova, albeit from a very great distance.

Secretly, too, I was attracted by the prospect of knowing my opinion would make no material difference to the success of the book. As an author, I am always aware of the damage a poor review can do, making me reluctant to review books I don’t like. I thought the Harry Potter books from number four on needed a damn good edit and with The Casual Vacancy clocking in at over 500 pages, I was already sharpening my claws as I started reading.

I found it hard going at first. But I was reading in small snatches and a book of this magnitude with its large ensemble cast — I counted 20 different points of view in the narrative — requires concentration. Once I gave it my full attention, I whipped through it. And I’m still thinking about it days later.

The book opens with the death of Barry Fairbrother, a member of the Parish Council in Pagford, a fictional town in the West Country whose ‘pretty façade’ masks deep divisions. Much of the townsfolk’s angst is directed at the residents of The Fields, a grim public housing estate. Barry has held the balance of power on a Council that has at best tolerated The Fields and the ‘casual vacancy’ created by his death presents an opportunity for the more conservative elements to push for the closure of a local drug treatment clinic and see responsibility for the public housing estate reassigned to a neighbouring town.

JK Rowling uses this premise to expose deep-rooted class and race prejudices in British society, and the result is both bleak and powerful. On the one hand she satirises the ignorance and hubris of elites. On the other, she humanises without a trace of romanticism the poor and vulnerable, epitomised by The Fields most notorious family, the Weedons.

There’s not a lot of musicality to JK Rowling’s writing. But I can forgive her that in light of her talents for spinning a good yarn and creating a cast of authentic characters — I found the teenagers in The Casual Vacancy particularly convincing — and especially for the choice of prejudices she’s chosen to tackle.

In an interview with The Guardian Weekly, Rowling describes her interest in “that drive, that rush to judgment, that is so prevalent in our society.”

“How many of us are able to expand our minds beyond our own personal experience? So many people…say, ‘Well, it worked for me’ or, ‘This is how my father managed it’ — these trite catch phrases — and the idea that other people might have had such a different life experience that their choices and beliefs and behaviours would be completely different from your own escapes a lot of otherwise intelligent people. The poor are discussed as this homogenous mash, like porridge. The idea that they might be individuals, and be where they are for very different, diverse reasons, again seems to escape some people.”

I find it truly admirable that the world’s most famous self-made woman chose to write a novel scathing in its criticism of the notion that anyone can ‘make it’ if they just work hard enough.

There is a scene towards the end of the book that takes place in the Parish Council meeting designed to rule on the future of the drug treatment clinic, in which local GP Parminder Jawanda takes on Council Chair Howard Mollison as he pontificates about how the drug-addicted residents of The Fields are a drain on the public purse. Dr Jawanda’s turns Mollison’s argument back on him to devastating effect for both of them.

Likewise, the book’s tragic ending also manages to demonstrate how prejudices are mutually damaging, both to those who hold them and those on the receiving end.

Listen to my review on Books and Arts Daily here.

Advertisements

About Angela Savage

Angela Savage is a Melbourne-based crime writer, who has lived and travelled extensively in Asia. Her first novel, Behind the Night Bazaar won the 2004 Victorian Premier's Literary Award for an unpublished manuscript. She is a winner of the Scarlet Stiletto Award and has thrice been shortlisted for Ned Kelly awards. Her third novel, The Dying Beach, was also shortlisted for the 2014 Davitt Award. Angela teaches writing and is currently studying for her PhD in Creative Writing at Monash University.
This entry was posted in Reviews & Interviews and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Review: The Casual Vacancy

  1. Angela – I’m so glad you liked this! It sounds as though it gets at some deep and truly important issues while at the same time as you say, telling a good yarn. I wasn’t sure whether to read this or not but it certainly sounds as though perhaps I should…

    Like

    • angelasavage says:

      It’s funny Margot, but when people ask me if I ‘liked’ The Casual Vacancy, I give them a politician’s answer. It doesn’t have the literary flourishes I usually like in my fiction (and non-fiction for that matter). And the characters, while authentic, are almost uniformly unlikeable. But the story has lingered long after I finished reading it, and it really made me think. Both are, to me, measures of satisfying fiction.

      Like

      • Dave says:

        Great review, Angela. Kudos to her, not needing to write another book, for choosing a subject that might well challenge a few readers’ assumptions, rather than pander to them…

        Like

        • angelasavage says:

          I feel exactly the same way, Dave.

          As for not needing to write another book, I suspect JK Rowling is driven by the same compulsion we share to write on regardless. I envy her the freedom to spend five years on one book.

          Like

  2. kathy d. says:

    How good to read this review. I have read some reviews in publications and at online blogs, but in none other have I seen these comments about J.K. Rowling’s social commentary, as portrayed in this new novel. Glad to read this. The book had not attracted me before reading this, but the perceptions about class and racial prejudice, about the rich and poor, pull me in like a magnet.
    I am over the top with my TBR Mt. Kilimanjaro and piles of books here, as well as awaiting some darn good reads (ahem), so I don’t know if I can fit it in, but I’m now intrigued.

    Like

    • angelasavage says:

      This is right up your political alley, Kathy, though it’s such a weighty tome, it might topple your TBR pile. My advice is to wait at least until it is released in paperback. Besides, The Half-Child is winging its way to you (the post here warned us of delivery delays in NY) and you’re going to need room for that 😉

      Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s